Why Quantified Self Folks Do Not Like to Track Psyche?

Check out Measured You Store for great deals on tracking gadgets and apps!

psychological self tracking In this post, I would like to raise a question that in some degree reflects my personal concerns about current trends in Quantified Self movement. Since this opinion is based primarily on my personal observations, I would really appreciate any feedback or comments from QS community. Please correct me if I am wrong, but why do we have so many tools and projects that focus on diet, sleep, exercise, but when it comes to tracking psyche, in particular, psychological states and traits, the inventory and range of QS projects is rather limited?

If you haven’t noticed it yet, we are already well equipped when it comes to tracking calories burned/consumed, steps taken, hours slept, blood composition, and other “tangible” aspects of our everyday lives. We actually got to the point that in mainstream and social media, phrase “Quantified Self” is associated exclusively with tracking diet, health and fitness. Even at the QS meetups, majority of self-discovery projects involve gadgets like Zeo, Fitbit and Bodymedia. Just a few people report tracking their mood, emotions or anxiety, and I am yet to hear about self-experiments and projects involving tracking self-esteem, confidence, agitation, creativity, charisma, attitudes, values, ego, and other psychological traits and states of mind. The attempts are being made recently to measure psychological states… (drumroll)..by passively monitoring physiological indicators. No doubt, the applications of actigraphy and psychophysics are thriving. But what happened to the good old fashioned psychometrics?

Somehow, the SELF in self-tracking was reduced to a handful of physiological and chemical indicators, while the more intrinsic psyche component has been ignored. I could think of several reasons for why this has happened, although to me, they sound more like excuses.

Lack of Automation

When big pioneers of QS movement like Gary Wolf and Seth Roberts were just starting to self-experiment and track their lives, the process of data collection was laborious: they had manually recorded every variable, and spent days searching for patterns and creating graphs. In the past ten years, developments in technology enabled us partially or completely automate the process of measuring things and collecting data. Just clip that gadget to the belt or put on that headband and voila! your data is collected, tabbed and reported for you. Such is the magic of passive measurement. In fact, there seems to be a major consensus among the QS folks that the less effort is required from us in collecting data, the better. Measuring psychological variables, on the other hand, still requires not only manual logging, but (gasp!) a certain degree of active THINKING. And that’s where most of the folks lose interest. But is putting some conscious effort in self-tracking really that bad? How difficult is it to make psychological self-tracking one of the regular habits, like brushing teeth or meditating?

Lack of Access to Tools

Part of it has to do with the perceived lack of necessary knowledge. How do you measure anxiety? Or self-esteem? Or happiness? What kind of questions should I ask myself? Luckily for us, most of the psychological questionnaires have been already developed, tested and validated by qualified researchers. So don’t reinvent the wheel, take it instead from those who designed and used it. You will be surprised how many questionnaires are available on the Internet, for free.

Misconceptions about Psychological Measures

Most people associate psychological measurement with lengthy questionnaires that would require anything from fifteen minutes to several hours. Naturally, it would be impractical to answer 10-40 questions on a daily or weekly basis. But you don’t have to! Remember, the main reason behind constructing long questionnaires is to make sure that the construct measured could be generalized. In other words, different questions about the same thing (e.g., anxiety) are asked again and again to make sure the overall concept is captured across different people.  But in order to track YOUR self-esteem (or confidence, or irritation, etc), you need only one or two questions. Just read the questionnaire, and pick those one or two items that resonate the most, and in your opinion, reflect that psychological construct FOR YOU. And don’t be afraid to slightly modify questions or scales: it is all about adapting the instrument to your needs and objectives.

Fear of Subjective Measures

It’s true, when it comes to measuring performance and experimental treatments, subjective measures are often prone to biases like observer effect, placebo effect, etc., so self-trackers are encouraged to rely on more objective instruments like gadgets and apps. But self-questionnaires still could (and should) be used for complementary and validation purposes. Sami Inkinen found  that a simple question about his mood in the morning is a good predictor of his later behavior and state of mind. I personally track my sleep using not only Zeo, Bodymedia and Sleep Time app, but also 2 simple questions (“was the sleep long enough” and “was the sleep restful enough”). So far, subjective assessment scale turned to be a better predictor of certain variables than objective measures.

I am not saying that physical health or diet are not important. After all, mens sana in corpore sano (a sound mind in a healthy body), as Romans used to say. But psychological factors are not of lesser importance. And I am not talking about serious psychological conditions like anxiety, panic attacks or clinical depression. I am talking about temporary psychological states and more long-terms psychological traits that often affect our everyday lives. I recently read that 80% (!) of all health concerns reported to doctors are stress related. Simply tracking just chemical imbalances in the blood, or your diet and symptoms might not be enough, if stress is the root of your problems. And there are many other examples. How many times you did not want to go to the gym because of the bad mood, or your productivity at work suffered from that sudden blow to self-esteem? How many times sudden change in your emotional state caused you to turn to unhealthy food or alcohol? It is clear that physical and psychological aspects are often interconnected and are equally important parts of SELF, so why do we tend to focus only on the former, while ignoring the latter?

So I made it my goal for 2013 to start putting together a small inventory of psychological questionnaires that could be used to measure and track most common psychological states. In the meantime, I recommend you, my dear readers, to give psyche-tracking a try. You may end up learning more about yourself by answering 2-3 simple questions daily for a week than using that shiny expensive gadget for months.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Print Friendly
Measured Me Recommends:
Best Apps for Self-Tracking: rTracker and Track & Share
Product of the Month:
Inner Balance HRV and Stress Sensor



Buy directly from HeartMath or shop on Amazon

9 Responses to Why Quantified Self Folks Do Not Like to Track Psyche?

  1. Hi Konstantin! Partly disagree. I tried a lot of programs for the iPhone. Yes, they are not so much. Yes, after a maximum of two weeks I was throwing them. But they still have.

    For example, what is now installed on my iphone (if not used): Expereal, Moodology, MoodyMe, Mood Pands, Optimism, iMood Journal. Though, maybe I did not understand, and you mean more than tracking the mood.

    Maybe you’re talking about is that there are reports to the QS on this subject?

  2. Measured Me says:

    Hi Alexey,

    Check out http://quantifiedself.com/mood. Alexandra and Robin from Quantified Self put together a nice overview of methods to measure mood. I personally like the “circumplex” model, where you mood using 2-dimensional scale (pleasantness-unpleasantness and activation/deactivation). I just added this approach to my rTracker app, but will continue measuring mood using just a simple 10-point “what is your mood” scale.

    Out of the apps that you listed, I personally like Expereal. I actually met developer, Jonathan, at one of the QS meetups here in New York.

  3. Константин! Мои эксперименты с программами для ифоне привели меня к следующему выводу – лучше всего заниматься самонаблюдением при помощи Гугле Форм. Так и живу последние 129 дней. Несколько раз в день отвечаю на 54 вопрос, коплю данные.

    Constantine! My experiments with programs for the iPhone have led me to this conclusion – the best introspect using Google search Form. And live past 129 days. Several times a day to answer 54 questions, I save the data.

    Константин, вопрос. Почему на блоге нет автоматических уведомлений о новых комментариях? Я веду с Вами беседу, а могу ведь даже и не знать, что Вы отвечаете. Блог не шлет на почту уведомлений об ответах :). Пользователи могли бы быть вовлечены в очень полезные беседы. А могут оставить комментарий и забыть о заметке :).

  4. Hiren Patel says:

    I have seen the very complicated but very accurate tests relating to moods that High specialized folks in the psychology field have. Like the mcmi 3. But it costs a lot of money to get the test done and see the answers. If this methodology was freed to the public, I feel we would have better ways of measuring mood. I’ve tried to track the most positive attributes I would want to model and the most negative attributes I want to cut out and correlate that with a custom mood questionnaire I give myself.

    I am very interested in this subject, So I might contact Alexandra and see if we can’t come up with app or methodology to do a better job of measuring mood.

  5. QS addict says:

    Interesting question. Perhaps, because most people are more concerned with more specific problems like physical health and stress?

  6. Eddie Garcia says:

    The quantifiedSelf.com site recently had a great post on how to track mood. I myself just started tracking mood and impulsivity. But you are right, there are not so many folks out there who log psychometric stuff on a regular basis.

  7. Measured Me says:

    Eddie, how do you measure impulsivity? Would love to see your results? do you have a blog or website?

  8. Andrei says:

    Ask friends for help. In many cases activity is mechanical and can’t be noticed well by the actor, but other people notice well. It can be used for impulsivity too. Behavior is often depended on hormons that activate with some rhythmic period. I use Chronolog Evrika to track my behavior with iPhone/iPad and to discover relations between different parameters of life. It shows cycles and helps to find day/week/month periods of events and conditions. Basic version of Evrika is free on AppStore.

  9. Measured Me says:

    Andrei, thank you! Just downloaded the app, will check it out!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ 1 = 4