Financial Fitness Score: A Quantified-Self Alternative to Credit Scores

Check out Measured You Store for great deals on tracking gadgets and apps!

applied personal analytics measuring financial solvency and financial fitnessLately, I have been thinking about scientifically sound approach to measuring personal financial fitness. By financial fitness, I mean both financial solvency and proficiency: the degree to which person is financially prepared for the retirement and unforeseeable events in the nearest future (e.g.,sickness, loss of job, etc.), and is managing finances efficiently. Considering that almost one third of Americans do not save or contribute to 401k enough, and almost two third do not believe they will have enough money to live comfortable after they retire, financial fitness should be regarded just as important as physical and mental health (in fact, health and finances are often correlated: financial problems are often cited as a main cause of stress). And just like mental and physical health, financial health should be measured and monitored. But is there an objective indicator of how financially fit are you? In this post, I propose a new, quantified-self approach to measuring financial fitness.

But first, let’s take a brief look at two metrics that are often currently used to assess someone’s financial health: the net worth and credit score. In my personal opinion, using these numbers to measure financial health would be misleading. The net worth, defined as total assets minus liabilities, captures only current state of person’s financial affairs; it does not reflect likelihood of retiring comfortably, or financial “savviness” of person. The second metric, FICO’s credit score, as well as its twin, Vanguard Score, or their more recent clones, e-scores, are not better. Something must be fundamentally wrong about the model under which engagement in activities like taking a loan or mortgage, or signing up for more credit cards, yields a higher score. The truth is, these scoring models regard us not as individuals but as “consumers”, with the primary objective to evaluate our current discretionary income and propensity to continue borrowing and spending money in the future.

But what about metric that would reflect your ability to diversify investments, save money, and live responsibly? Alas, such metric does not exist yet. And I think that now is a perfect time to develop one. Imagine a system that would take into consideration various aspects of your personal finances such as:

  • monthly savings rates
  • contributions to (401)k and other retirement plans
  • ownership of real estate and cars
  • passive income sources like profits from investment real estate, or from trading stocks
  • interest from CDs, saving accounts, stocks, mutual funds
  • lifestyle inflation rates (living beyond your means)
  • inconspicuous consumption

and combines them in one single score that reflects both your financial “savviness” and potential to retire with a desired “nest egg”. Each of these factors would have a positive ((e.g., saving at least 25% of your monthly paycheck, or keeping your rent under 35% of your monthly pay), or negative (e.g., spending more money on eating out versus groceries, or owning a car in the area with well developed public transportation) negative impact on the score, and each factor would have a different weight. The score is computed in such a way that it discourages living beyond your means, and encourages more careful and informed management of personal finances.

Such scoring system should be offered on opt-in basis, as opposed to FICO or e-scores. It may be either norm-referenced (you are compared to other people nationwide, or locally, similar to credit scores) or criterion-referenced (score is computed based on your desired amount for retirement, and is used only to measure personal progress). And, of course, it could be implemented in Mint, Yodlee or other financial tracking software.

What do you think?

(image credit: Outside Ordinary blog)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Print Friendly
Measured Me Recommends:
Best Apps for Self-Tracking: rTracker and Track & Share
Product of the Month:
Inner Balance HRV and Stress Sensor

Buy directly from HeartMath or shop on Amazon

5 Responses to Financial Fitness Score: A Quantified-Self Alternative to Credit Scores

  1. Jay Bradfield says:

    I assume this score would just be used by individuals themselves, but the problem is that individuals put varying values on things. What may be a low value activity for one person could be high value for someone else.
    For example, “eating out” is a famous category for penny pinchers to cut, but reducing that can also significantly reduce your social life. I’d rather have to keep working, even if I had a really bad job, and still have the money to eat out regularly since that allows me to meet new people and to reconnect with current friends.
    “Eating out” is also potentially a good way to advance your business/career. Think of the of the book “Never Eat Alone.” If your goal is networking, I can assure you that high profile connections are not going to come hang out with you at your studio and munch on Ramen. And often times networking is a numbers game (much like sales), so connecting with people can really add up $$$. But everyone I know who does it more than earns it back.
    BTW, that makes me wonder if there’s a way to quantify networking success.
    Combine a measure of “successful networking” with a measure of expenditure on networking (e.g. eating out) and you can could have a very powerful ROI tool.

  2. Jay,
    1) Re: eating out. It is all about maintaining a healthy balance 🙂
    2) Interesting point about measuring “success of networking”. That means you need to assign “values” to each of the members of your social network. I guess one could apply a sociometric/social networks theory model to this and come up with some kind of metrics. Similar to models of influence metrics (e.g., Klout), but it measures influence (or affluence, importance, etc.) of your network instead.

  3. Simply weight the eating out behavior with your dining companions. I will agree that a personalized algorithm would be more effective. For instance, choosing to take my young family out for dinner instead of cooking at home is much different than eating out while traveling, meeting some industry peers for a bite or even a meal with friends. Financial impact needs to be weighed against several less tangible gains.

  4. Hi Alex!
    Just checked your site, Cred score looks very promising. Just requested beta-invite 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 + 8 =